The leaks I can see from the public listing
Title, bullets, A+, reviews, brand defense, and obvious ad-real-estate problems. Storefront URL only — no Seller Central login until we agree to work.
Services · Croître
Conquesting without a conversion edge is just expensive spite.
Best fit: you actually win the click on price, reviews, or use case
I only conquest where your listing wins the click. Everything else is a vanity impression.
Category targeting is a test with a cap, not a firehose. Brand-safe exclusions keep you off pages you should not be on.
Defense of your own listings is a different workstream. Conquest is offense with a conversion edge — or it does not run.
Brands that beat a named rival on price, reviews, or a clearer use case and want that traffic — not brands trying to bully a better page.
A weaker listing attacking a category leader. We will not buy that traffic. That is how ACOS explodes.
Price, reviews, use case, or image. If we cannot name the edge, we do not target the ASIN.
Own campaigns, own budget. Conquest should never hide inside a blended search campaign.
Win/loss in writing. ACOS or CVR breaks the rule — the target dies.
Weekly. New rivals in, dead ones out. Offense is a list, not a personality.
Pick the rivals you actually beat. Build ASIN targeting with tight budgets. Write the win/loss rule so we know when to stop.
A short ASIN list, win/loss rules, exclusions for brand-safe gaps, and a kill switch when a target stops converting.
Named seats, not a logo wall. Each page says the job, the rail, and what still has to happen in Seller Central or the Ads Console.
Reverse-ASIN and seed-keyword research (Cerebro, including Magnet) so listings and exact campaigns start from real demand — then the search-term report decides.
Keyword Scout, product database, and sales estimates as a second research lens — especially when Helium 10 and Jungle Scout disagree on volume.
Enterprise Amazon intelligence plus ad automation: Seller Central, Vendor Central, and Ads in one layer — used when a catalog is too large for a spreadsheet harvest.
No. If their listing converts better, we do not buy that traffic.
Opposite direction. Defense holds your page. Conquest visits theirs — only when you win.
Sometimes, if you can convert that shopper honestly. Often it is a trap. We decide per rival, not as a default.
A test cap. If conquest cannot prove itself without stealing search dollars, it stays small or it stays off.
You do not need to hire it to find out if it belongs on the account. Send the public store link. I tell you whether this lever is leaking, whether I am the person to run it, and what week one would be.
Title, bullets, A+, reviews, brand defense, and obvious ad-real-estate problems. Storefront URL only — no Seller Central login until we agree to work.
If I cannot show the leaks, I decline. You are not added to a roster. A “no” is a complete answer, not a follow-up sequence.
Harvest, defense, listing pass, or “not yet.” Named in writing — not a 40-slide deck and a 12-month PDF.
Capacity is limited because I work the accounts myself. The review is how we decide if this workstream belongs on yours.
Request a free reviewDéfendre les termes de marque et les fiches contre conquesting et hijacking.
Trouver les requêtes qui convertissent dans auto et broad — puis promouvoir ou tuer selon un calendrier.
Titre, puces et backend qui portent les requêtes payantes — pas seulement le volume.
Contrôle quotidien des enchères, budgets et search terms sur Sponsored Products, Brands et Display.